Also, I Can Kill You With My Brain
Mar. 19th, 2012 08:30 pmThe other day I had a rather unpleasant surprise from the El Camino YMCA. It turns out that before one can attend any of their prenatal exercise classes, one must produce a note of consent from one's doctor. They have a handy little "Pre/Post Natal CONSENT FORM" for the doctor to fill out, which I have a copy of here. I complained about this a bit when I got home:
chinders suggested I put dead fish on their desks.
andres_s_p_b suggested I forge the requested paperwork. After playing along long enough to e-mail my doctor and see if there's a good time this week for me to drop in and get the form actually filled out, I thought about it a bit more and decided exactly how annoyed I was.
I am very, very annoyed.
I have written the following letter, which I intend to send to the Executive Director, both Associate Executive Directors, and the Group Exercise Director. My goals here are twofold:
1. Blister their ears so badly their hair catches fire.
2. Effect immediate policy change.
I consider 2 less likely, so I'll settle for 1 if I have to.
Have a look. See if you can spot any ways it could be improved towards either of those goals. Also, do you think I should have my doctor countersign the letter or at least review the paragraph she's in, or is that just playing into their hands? Furthermore, while I'm planning to e-mail each director a separate personally-addressed copy, should I mail four physical copies as well or just one? If just one, does "Dear Directors:" work as a salutation?
Dear [name]:
About a month ago, I attended one of your yoga classes with a friend of mine who is a YMCA member. My friend recommended that I try the prenatal yoga class, which she found very helpful during her own recent pregnancy. This past Sunday, I attempted to do just that, only to discover that you require a note of consent from a doctor for any pre- or post-natal specific classes. While I understand that it is recommended for any person beginning a new exercise program to consult with a physician, applying this requirement to pregnant women only is patronizing, discriminatory, and unacceptable.
My obstetrician is not a yoga instructor. She is no more qualified to assess the medical appropriateness of this particular physical activity than that of any other physical activity in which I engage: walking my dog, bicycling to work, or visiting a climbing gym twice a week. My doctor has shared with me the particular concerns of pregnancy as it relates to exercise; the signs that indicate a particular activity might need to be modified, reduced, or eliminated; and her opinion that I should “keep doing what [I’m] doing.” I am entirely capable of determining whether my participation in a given physical activity is safe, healthy, or comfortable. As a legal adult, my decisions about what to do with my body—including how or whether to stretch, exercise, or move about—are entirely my own. Requiring the consent of another adult, as though I were a third-grader on a field trip, is infantilizing and degrading.
If you have concerns about the safety of your program or your legal liability, presenting me with an informational pamphlet or a liability waiver such as the one you had me sign before the general yoga class would have been appropriate. Requiring all participants in your group exercise program to affirm that they have discussed the effect of their chosen program of exercise on their personal medical conditions with a physician would be ridiculous overkill, but at least it would be consistent, non-discriminatory overkill. Requiring not only such an affirmation, but the actual consent of a third party, from any subset of the population is treating that subpopulation as less than adult, less than legally competent, and less than equal.
This discriminatory policy should be eliminated immediately. My pregnancy in no way changes my status as a competent, decision-making adult. Over the next few years, if all goes well, I will sign all manner of permission slips and consent forms for the child I am currently carrying. Requiring me to secure a third party’s permission for any personal activity reduces me to the status of a child incapable of evaluating a situation or making a decision. This is simply unacceptable.
I would be glad to attend your programs when I hear that you have changed your policies to consider all legal adults equally competent to make their own decisions. Until then, my active lifestyle and I will support other businesses and organizations.
Most sincerely,
[me]
I am very, very annoyed.
I have written the following letter, which I intend to send to the Executive Director, both Associate Executive Directors, and the Group Exercise Director. My goals here are twofold:
1. Blister their ears so badly their hair catches fire.
2. Effect immediate policy change.
I consider 2 less likely, so I'll settle for 1 if I have to.
Have a look. See if you can spot any ways it could be improved towards either of those goals. Also, do you think I should have my doctor countersign the letter or at least review the paragraph she's in, or is that just playing into their hands? Furthermore, while I'm planning to e-mail each director a separate personally-addressed copy, should I mail four physical copies as well or just one? If just one, does "Dear Directors:" work as a salutation?
Dear [name]:
About a month ago, I attended one of your yoga classes with a friend of mine who is a YMCA member. My friend recommended that I try the prenatal yoga class, which she found very helpful during her own recent pregnancy. This past Sunday, I attempted to do just that, only to discover that you require a note of consent from a doctor for any pre- or post-natal specific classes. While I understand that it is recommended for any person beginning a new exercise program to consult with a physician, applying this requirement to pregnant women only is patronizing, discriminatory, and unacceptable.
My obstetrician is not a yoga instructor. She is no more qualified to assess the medical appropriateness of this particular physical activity than that of any other physical activity in which I engage: walking my dog, bicycling to work, or visiting a climbing gym twice a week. My doctor has shared with me the particular concerns of pregnancy as it relates to exercise; the signs that indicate a particular activity might need to be modified, reduced, or eliminated; and her opinion that I should “keep doing what [I’m] doing.” I am entirely capable of determining whether my participation in a given physical activity is safe, healthy, or comfortable. As a legal adult, my decisions about what to do with my body—including how or whether to stretch, exercise, or move about—are entirely my own. Requiring the consent of another adult, as though I were a third-grader on a field trip, is infantilizing and degrading.
If you have concerns about the safety of your program or your legal liability, presenting me with an informational pamphlet or a liability waiver such as the one you had me sign before the general yoga class would have been appropriate. Requiring all participants in your group exercise program to affirm that they have discussed the effect of their chosen program of exercise on their personal medical conditions with a physician would be ridiculous overkill, but at least it would be consistent, non-discriminatory overkill. Requiring not only such an affirmation, but the actual consent of a third party, from any subset of the population is treating that subpopulation as less than adult, less than legally competent, and less than equal.
This discriminatory policy should be eliminated immediately. My pregnancy in no way changes my status as a competent, decision-making adult. Over the next few years, if all goes well, I will sign all manner of permission slips and consent forms for the child I am currently carrying. Requiring me to secure a third party’s permission for any personal activity reduces me to the status of a child incapable of evaluating a situation or making a decision. This is simply unacceptable.
I would be glad to attend your programs when I hear that you have changed your policies to consider all legal adults equally competent to make their own decisions. Until then, my active lifestyle and I will support other businesses and organizations.
Most sincerely,
[me]
no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 03:58 am (UTC)FWIW, it seems like an appropriately-blistering letter to me.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 04:03 am (UTC)That might actually be another thing to mention, if you feel inspired to call a handful of other YMCAs that offer these classes and see if any of them require such a thing -- you could make the "this is also unusual" point.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 04:28 am (UTC)I would generally be happy to sign a form stating that I've discussed exercising with my doctor, and even give my doctor's name and address. But having the doctor sign the form for something as gentle as a prenatal yoga class seems like total overkill!
no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 05:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 06:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 07:29 am (UTC)I want a word like "only to pregnant women" which doesn't really work since it's a pre-natal.
What frustrates me about this policy is that if it /were/ applied fairly across the board - by which I mean for people who /may/ be at risk during the activity, then they would be requiring notes from diabetics or people with pacemakers, with low bone density, or hip replacements.
There should be some way of pointing out that they're treating pregnant women as a group differently from other groups that would share the same level of risk.
Also, if it is a requirement just for that one gym, and you really want to bring attention, maybe requesting a meeting with the activity director or some such. Either one-on-one or with a small group. Scheduling a meeting to address some "concerns about some potentially discriminatory language in your policies" tends to open doors sometimes.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 07:32 am (UTC)Also I'm wondering if the requirement may come from the fact that it's specifically a pre-natal class. If you were wanting to take a "normal" class - would you still have to have the signed form?
no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 04:18 pm (UTC)Sometimes I wish that the bad things people do would be more obviously bad to the rest of the world.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 11:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 05:52 pm (UTC)There are definitely a number of different tactics I could take if my goal was prenatal yoga, or even prenatal-yoga-without-jumping-through-this-particular-hoop. But my goal is no longer prenatal yoga.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 11:09 pm (UTC)ALSO, I was, i recall now, annoyed at needing a dr. note, but I'm MORE ANNOYED and bothered now. I wonder how much my level of putting up with it was due to the fact that i "needed" some prenatal yoga because I had a painful pregnancy and how much is the current political "war against women" climate. I think all the attempts to block abortion, birth control, freedom in general, for women is making things like this more troublesome than I felt it was then...
no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 11:28 pm (UTC)I think that rolling your eyes and jumping through the silly hoops is a totally reasonable response -- it's the way to get what you want, if what you want is the class, and it's not really much work. I didn't even realize what was really bothering me about it until I'd sat with it for a day or so, so I could easily have just gotten the silly note and moved on. But having identified the actual issue, now I am having a Principled Moment.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-24 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 05:57 pm (UTC)They're making the distinction on whether you're signing up for the pre- or post-natal classes, not on what you look like.
I suppose in three months or so when I am completely unarguably obvious I could go try to sign up for something else and see what happens. In the interests of completeness.
Those specific comparisons to other groups with high injury risk could be handy if they try to argue back at me; thank you.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 07:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 10:43 am (UTC)Good letter. Hang in there.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 12:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 04:45 pm (UTC)I sort of worry whether pointing out quite so explicitly that I could ignore their rule by doing something even slightly riskier at their facility might lead them to look harder for pregnant people rather than people taking pregnancy-related classes, which would be remarkably counter-productive.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 07:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 11:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 11:13 pm (UTC)2. Also, this YMCA is located in Mountain View and I've noticed and commented before that this is not a poor person's YMCA. We have a 1997 civic. Nothing special, but often, by far, the poorest car in the lot. Audi, BMW, etc. This is yuppie YMCA. Which was very confusing to me for quite some time.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-20 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-22 04:03 pm (UTC)Do you know why they're requiring this form? That might be very useful knowledge to tweak the letter (if applicable once you know why).
I am unsure about multiple copies - if you're already emailing, why the paper letter? (But I'd lean towards separate, individually addressed if you are going to send a paper letter. Consistency.)
no subject
Date: 2012-03-22 04:30 pm (UTC)People take paper letters more seriously sometimes.