Harry and Sally -- They Fight Crime!
Jun. 13th, 2011 11:25 pmI am having an issue with television lately. I like shows with nice ensemble casts -- Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Firefly, Leverage, Castle. However. Could we have one without the romantic tension, please? It's not obligatory! I promise, I will still like witty dialogue even if nobody is using it to talk past each other for this week's angst-creating misunderstanding!
It's the angst I can't stand, really. Makes me want to shake people. And the repetitiveness; the whole male-lead-female-lead will-they-won't-they has been done to death. As a character arc, okay, but people actually do make decisions about these things, and change over time, and when the same two characters are in the same maybe-we-will-maybe-we-won't-let's-tease-the-viewers-a-bit-and-then-go-sigh-wistfully-in-entirely-different-places-that-line-up-neatly-for-the-divided-screen-effect for months and years on end it is aggravating. Have leads who think about it and decide they won't! If this is too complex, have leads who've never even thought about it! Make them siblings if you have to! Alternatively, established, comfortable relationships are fun, too. Nick and Nora Charles, from The Thin Man -- excellent romance, flirting, no tension. Works for me.
Buffy does fairly well here, actually; there's angst, but there is also change, and nobody pines after anybody for the entire series. Wash and Zoe on Firefly are an excellent example of a good, fun, established relationship, although both Simon and Kaylee and Mal and Inara make me want to throw shoes at people. (Eh, it only got a season, maybe they'd have fixed it.)
Leverage and Castle are both seriously starting to grate. We are about to get the next season of Leverage from NetFlix, and I am getting kind of trepidacious. I was really enjoying the subtle background bits with Parker flirting with Hardison and Eliot, and then towards the end of season 2 Hardison noticed and starting... angsting. Nate and Sophie are already obnoxious enough, I do not need more romantic tension in this show. Especially with Parker, sheesh. At least it won't be the both of them doing it, even if the writers do insist on going there with Hardison.
It's the angst I can't stand, really. Makes me want to shake people. And the repetitiveness; the whole male-lead-female-lead will-they-won't-they has been done to death. As a character arc, okay, but people actually do make decisions about these things, and change over time, and when the same two characters are in the same maybe-we-will-maybe-we-won't-let's-tease-the-viewers-a-bit-and-then-go-sigh-wistfully-in-entirely-different-places-that-line-up-neatly-for-the-divided-screen-effect for months and years on end it is aggravating. Have leads who think about it and decide they won't! If this is too complex, have leads who've never even thought about it! Make them siblings if you have to! Alternatively, established, comfortable relationships are fun, too. Nick and Nora Charles, from The Thin Man -- excellent romance, flirting, no tension. Works for me.
Buffy does fairly well here, actually; there's angst, but there is also change, and nobody pines after anybody for the entire series. Wash and Zoe on Firefly are an excellent example of a good, fun, established relationship, although both Simon and Kaylee and Mal and Inara make me want to throw shoes at people. (Eh, it only got a season, maybe they'd have fixed it.)
Leverage and Castle are both seriously starting to grate. We are about to get the next season of Leverage from NetFlix, and I am getting kind of trepidacious. I was really enjoying the subtle background bits with Parker flirting with Hardison and Eliot, and then towards the end of season 2 Hardison noticed and starting... angsting. Nate and Sophie are already obnoxious enough, I do not need more romantic tension in this show. Especially with Parker, sheesh. At least it won't be the both of them doing it, even if the writers do insist on going there with Hardison.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 06:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 04:30 pm (UTC)To much with the cutsey robots I think.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 11:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 04:22 pm (UTC)While I find the secondary characters thinking they should just get on with it cute, because I agree with them, I also find it particularly irritating as it indicates that the writers damn well know better. I don't like being able to see the writers doing things, instead of the characters doing things. Breaks my suspension of disbelief. :(
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 03:11 pm (UTC)We've seen four episodes so far, and it's a good police procedural, with a lot of interesting plot twists. No weird romantic Moonlighting stuff showing up yet (I saw a lot of it back in the old show Moonlighting, and it bored me to bits.)
It can be a gruesome show sometimes, because of the police procedural thing, so I'm still deciding if it's Suitable For Me to Watch, but it is interesting and fun.
and unlike NCIS, it doesn't make me downright cranky. As far as I am concerned, NCIS is fired.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 04:36 pm (UTC)With Castle particularly, if they want tension they can lean on the whole plot with Beckett's mom! There is no need to put romantic tension in the friendship when you have tension from this other thing already! Sheesh!
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 08:15 pm (UTC)(Heh. Ask me about why I should be laughing while making this comment when you see me at 4th St.)
no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 06:10 am (UTC)Exactly!
Ask me about why I should be laughing while making this comment when you see me at 4th St.
Eeeeeeee 4th Street! ::bounce bounce bounce::
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 12:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 06:11 am (UTC)But oh my gods the awesome that is Castle. It may just be the awesome talking, but I think I kind of understand where everyone is /coming/ from season 3, they give some reasons why they aren't just jumping in. But I'm probably just drinking the Kool-Aid on that.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 03:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 06:05 am (UTC)